Podcast: Student Loans: Why We Need to Teach Financial Literacy in Schools

In 2014, Federal Education Minister, Christopher Pyne started planning reforms to Australia’s funding of university education, including the deregulation of university fees and the end of interest free loans for students.

Like Minister Pyne, I benefited from a free university education, fully funded by the tax system, so  I find his idea troubling.

I preferred things the way they were in the 1980s, where tertiary education was still regarded as a common good. Sure, individuals would benefit from the careers it would open up to them, but society would also benefit from having a well-educated population. It was a great equalizer. No fees, allowed people who could not otherwise afford it, to access higher education. Requiring people to either pay up front fees or incur a debt to be paid off later through the taxation system could turn away people who were already struggling financially.

I did incur a HECS debt during my final year of a Bachelor of Education. For me, that one year worth of debt was a lot of money. Back then, a graduate teacher earned $28,000 before tax, but most of us didn’t earn that because it was hard to find work. I was worked as a casual relief teacher, and in my second year managed to pick up 2 days a week of regular work. The other 3 days, I depended on people calling in sick in order to work.

Schools were difficult to access by public transport, so I needed a car loan. I also had to furnish and rent an apartment that I shared with another graduate teacher. We lived for weeks on instant noodles and tinned tuna.

Fortunately, our HECS debt did not accrue interest at a commercial rate. Fortunately, we weren’t required to make repayments unless our income passed a certain threshold.

Paying off my HECS debt was not something that kept me awake at night worrying. My one year worth of debt was manageable once I started earning money, and with the help of a tax accountant, I paid it off after just a few years.

But HECS back then was a cost a lot less than HECS does now.

Deregulation of university fees will make it even more difficult for people to afford tertiary education, and commerical rates of interest on student loans will cause many to live with crippling debt at a time when housing has never been less affordable, and tertiary education has never been less likely to guarantee a job or a high income.

I don’t believe this is good for our society.

The US  college system, which Minister Pyne aspires to, exists in a very different context. Unlike Australia, free tertiary education has never been a policy, so systems, like student loans have been developed to allow access for those who can not immediately afford the fees. But in the US there are many different student loans, there are also many grants and scholarships which can remove or significantly reduce the fee burden for many students.

Donelle Batty is currently studying in the United States and spoke with some students about how the student loan system impacts on their lives for our podcast, The Teachers Education Review. It’s an interesting listen and raises a number of issues  to consider in the Australian context.

In the United States, students are required to make significant decisions about incurring debt from the moment they leave high school. But how well are they prepared for that, and how well do we prepare our students for that in Australia?

Now more than ever, I see an urgency to teach financial literacy in schools.

TER 39 Banner

Advertisements

One thought on “Podcast: Student Loans: Why We Need to Teach Financial Literacy in Schools

  1. Without Whitlam’s free tertiary education policies, my husband may not have attended university. His parents could not see the point of doing an Arts degree. “What job can you get with that?” they asked.
    Even with free tuition, he like many students, took a part-time job to buy the extras needed to complete his course and to pay board to his parents.
    If we go the way of the United States, students with families like my husband’s will not be given these opportunities to learn and expand their thinking. Some people see ‘learning for the sake of learning’ as an unaffordable luxury. I see a society that hasn’t been taught to think critically and deeply as a ‘disaster waiting to happen’.
    My husband has gone on to complete a part-time law degree, a forensic computer course and is currently learning to program through an online University course for which he sits exams in the city.
    He has made a considerable contribution to our society with his ability to problem solve and is respected for his well-considered opinions and ideas.
    This may not have happened if he had been part of a tertiary system with deregulated fees and loan sharks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s